Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With ADHD NURS 6630N

The Assignment
Examine Case Study: A Young Caucasian Girl With ADHD You will be asked to make
three decisions concerning the medication to prescribe to this client. Be sure to consider
factors that might impact the client’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes.
At each decision point stop to complete the following:
 Decision #1
o Which decision did you select?
o Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the
Learning Resources.
o What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with
evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
o Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #1 and the results
of the decision. Why were they different?
 Decision #2
o Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the
Learning Resources.
o What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with
evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
o Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #2 and the results
of the decision. Why were they different?
 Decision #3
o Why did you select this decision? Support your response with evidence and references to the
Learning Resources.
o What were you hoping to achieve by making this decision? Support your response with
evidence and references to the Learning Resources.
o Explain any difference between what you expected to achieve with Decision #3 and the results
of the decision. Why were they different?
Also include how ethical considerations might impact your treatment plan and
communication with clients.
Note: Support your rationale with a minimum of three academic resources. While you
may use the course text to support your rationale, it will not count toward the resource
requirement.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK7Assgn+last name+first
initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
 Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria
from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document
you saved as “WK7Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my
paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:

Week 9 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 9 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:
Week 9 Assignment

Making Connections

Now that you have:
 Assessed clients presenting with ADHD
 Developed personalized plans of therapy for clients with ADHD
 Examined factors that influence pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes in clients
requiring therapy for ADHD
 Explored ethical and legal implications of prescribing therapy to clients with ADHD
Next week, you will build on your assessment and treatment skills as you examine
clients presenting for therapy for impulsivity, compulsivity, and addiction.

Struggling to meet your deadline ?

Get assistance on

Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With ADHD NURS 6630N

done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Learning Resources
Note: To access this week’s required library resources, please click on the link to the
Course Readings List, found in the Course Materials section of your Syllabus.
Required Readings
Note: Review all materials from the Discussion.
Conners, C. K., Sitarenios, G., Parker, J. D. A., & Epstein, J. N. (1998). Revision and
restandardization of the Conners' Teacher Rating Scale (CTRS-R): Factors, structure,
reliability, and criterion validity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 26, 279-291.
Note: Retrieved from Walden Library databases.
Required Media
Laureate Education (2016d). Case study: A young Caucasian girl with ADHD
[Interactive media file]. Baltimore, MD: Author
Note: This case study will serve as the foundation for this week’s Assignment.

To prepare for this Assignment:
 This case study will serve as the foundation for this week’s Assignment.